I am not a 迷信 person. I want to say that overall I am quite scientific in my thinking and reasoning. That is why I never believe anything to do with astrology, blood types etc. However the MBTI test is science backed... or so I thought.
In the last 3 month since I was hypomanic, I have been down a deep rabbit hole to try to understand myself better.
I recall doing the MBTI test while on a drive to Blue Mountain last year. At the time, my score was INTJ.
Today, I decided to see if the results still hold up. The results became ENTJ-T.
Finally I decided that maybe just for fun, how does Chatgpt see me?
The prompt I used specifically is: "based on everything i told you so far. ascertain my MBTI. Don't use the chats where I told you I am INTJ"
Again it came back with a different result: ESTP (with unusually strong strategic/reflective traits).
So all that is to say, which one is it? Lols.
I am quite confused myself. To be honest I have no strong answer at this point, but I am more inclined to believe Chatgpt since the data points are extensive based on all my chat logs.
As I dug deeper into this topic, I found some really interesting videos from vox and other sources basically confirming my suspicions. These tests are all positive in nature in describing the person. And they are often vague enough that it can apply to a multitude of people; just like astrology or blood type personality indicators.
We as humans love to fit neatly and categorize into distinct boxes. It has helped our ancestors survive to this day.
On the other hand, to say that these tests offer no meaning would also miss the mark. I think they can give you a good snapshot of who you are as a person. Especially useful when getting to know another person/stranger. But ultimately it is necessary to do introspection and ask for external feedback to see if the test outcomes hold true.
Peace from Toronto



















